";s:4:"text";s:26759:"wiley manuscript status under consideration. Asked by Ramkumar CB Often this is where editors will want reviewers to state their recommendation - see the next section - but otherwise this area is best reserved for communicating malpractice such as suspected plagiarism, fraud, unattributed work, unethical procedures, duplicate publication, bias or other conflicts of interest. Drawing a conclusion that is contradicted by the author's own statistical or qualitative evidence, Ignoring a process that is known to have a strong influence on the area under study, The sufficient use of control experiments, The regularity of sampling in time-dependent studies, The validity of questions, the use of a detailed methodology and the data analysis being done systematically (in qualitative research), That qualitative research extends beyond the author's opinions, with sufficient descriptive elements and appropriate quotes from interviews or focus groups, Contradictory data that either are not self-consistent or disagree with the conclusions, Confirmatory data that adds little, if anything, to current understanding - unless strong arguments for such repetition are made, Help the editor properly contextualize the research and add weight to your judgement, Show the author what key messages are conveyed to the reader, so they can be sure they are achieving what they set out to do, Focus on successful aspects of the paper so the author gets a sense of what they've done well. An ORCID ID is required for first and corresponding authors and is strongly encouraged for all authors. Often you can't see these until you log in to submit your review. If it is too bad, note that in your review and it should be up to the authors to have the manuscript edited.". Our policy on posting, licensing, citation of preprints and communications with the media about preprints of primary research manuscripts is summarized below. The review process may take a few weeks or even months. Where improvements are needed, a recommendation for major or minor revision is typical. We believe that peer-review needs to be efficient, rigorous, and fair for everyone involved. 3 answers. Editage Insights is funded by Editage and endorses services provided by Editage but is editorially independent. Article Types. Full disclosure: Editage Insights is a product of Editage, a global provider of world-class scientific communication solutions. Status shown to applicant What it means Draft An application is being worked on by an applicant but has not been submitted. [CDATA[// >