a:5:{s:8:"template";s:2070:"
{{ keyword }}
";s:4:"text";s:16819:"(cont. IS would also help outside with wind. I would love to see his test images. The model I use feels solid and the barrel is constructed with metal. Chris referred to the Canon RF 16mm F2.8 STM as 'a little gem'! The 135mm f2.8 in particular can take amazing photos of the brighter deep sky objects with about 1 second time . CP+ 2023: Sigma has announced it is bringing its trio of DC DN APS-C prime lenses to Nikon's Z mount: its first lenses for Nikon's mirrorless system. You can go lower, but you have to watch your technique. This is a stunning lens, clearly one of the very best lenses that Canon produces, this is in the same world class as the 35 1.4, 85 1.2 L lenses. The CA is pretty low wide open and it rivals my 200mm L lens. One difference worth pointing out is for those who image using narrowband filters. The latter are designed for crop sensor cameras and the back of the lens sticks too far into the body of the camera and would hit the EOS-clip filter. I used Canon's 135 f/2 for ten years. "That is why when SLRs came along the 200mm became the big seller and the 135 was largely forgotten"Did you notice that this 135mm F2 lens on an APS-C camera is more or less equivalent to a 200mm F2.8 lens on an FF camera ?So this lens can be seen as the 200mm F2.8 lens for APS-C camera users. - Actually though, it's performance is so good that you really have to consider it a bargain, even at the $800-900 street price. Ironically all the sample images in this post are painfully soft. its useful to keep in mind these bokeh circles are the result of light sources bright lamps from autos Christmas lights streetlamps etc and are seriously overused in articles on lenses with strong subject\ backround seperations, they approach parody in the way they characterise subject separation, for most purposes and in most portrait situations its less highlight dominant backrounds that grace a photo. But first, there are several general rules which must be understood. Orion nebula shot with Canon T3i and Rokinon 135mm @ F2.0 150 shots with dark bias and flats stacked and edited. Its a joy to work with every time. My goal for this article was to show some great example photos and share some ideas for projects this lens is a good fit for. I think the bokeh won me over with the cat, as well as the fact that I like animals; the case for the duck was the same. Zoom lenses are entirely unsuitable for astrophotography due to prominent aberrations of every kind. They account for much of the disagreement that we see on-line (but not for the rudeness and viciousness of some of it). Stuff I used to take the photos. From my experience, the toughest test on a lense is its ability to function wide open. The OP admits he limited experience with lenses other than what he has. Any experience with this camera and would this lens be a good fit? When i check a F stop chart, i see 15 stops if i count the main, and the secondary ones: 2, 2.4, 2.8, 3.3, 4, 4.8, 5.6, 6.7, 8, 9.5, 11, 13, 16, 19, 22. She's cold? Samyang 85mm f1.83. If experience has taught me anything, its that the practical, pain-free equipment that gets the most use under the stars. This lens is simply lighter, cheaper & faster (f/2.0 vs f/2.8). Finally, to prevent image shift during exposure, all telephoto lenses must be supported at two points: at the camera end, and at the far end with a large retaining ring. http://www.adstateagent.com | http://www.printradiant.com | http://www.hitsticker.com, I love this lens. Recently, the FAA announced that recreational drone pilots in the USA can request LAANC authorization to fly in controlled airspace at night. The 50mm f/1.4 and f/1.2 is another story.While the 135mm f/2, in general, is a good lens, there are lots of lenses other than the 135 f/2 that will produce a very smoothly blurred background, including zoom lenses.It sounds like Micael is new to photography.Just my impression from this article. Please re-enable javascript to access full functionality. It would not surprise me if modern lenses were useable at full aperture. I really like how they augment my longer focal length scopes. I have a vintage Nikon135mm f/2.8 AI-s which produces virtually the same bokeh and weighs a quarter of this or any other 135mm AF lens. Nice article for beginners.It's all in the eyes of the beholder. Simple fact is the Samyang 135/2 is a remarkably good lens for the price, and it offers a set of optical characteristics that typically cost 2-4x more. The colder temperatures will make DSLR astrophotography much more practical, and there are plenty of great targets to choose from. (purchased for $899), reviewed December 9th, 2006 I took a few shots with the lens on my way home after buying it. You are entitled to your opinions, and I respect that! Several functions may not work. The 135mm f/2.0 ED UMC Lens for Canon EF Mount from Rokinon is a manual focus telephoto prime lens useful for portraiture and all medium telephoto applications. During the frigid months of winter, my motivation to spend over an hour setting up my complete deep-sky imaging rig dwindles. So, for Joe User or especially for Jane Client, one really has to look closely to see much of a difference. I think prime users get too used to the idea of bokeh as the only answer. I heard it's very sharp and well corrected. Beautiful portrait lens. With a good smartphone, some creative legwork, and the photos scaled down as they are in this article you can make photos that at least just as good. He loves photography, and runs a YouTube channel with tutorials, lens reviews and photography inspiration. Neutral yet very nice colours. Sigma 105/2.8 DG EX Macro (very sharp at infinity) Extrapolating from this, minimum recommended guidescope power is 120x for the 300mm telephoto, 80x for the 200mm, and 55x for the 135mm. I have compared many times my 135/2 against my 100/2.8 and there is a big difference. Zeiss Jena or Oberkochen? In my test, nikon have the same color correction than Canon and same sharpness. Focus are dead on with my Fullframe or APS system. I've been using a vintage FD 135/3.5 on my A7R IV as a compact tele option, often alongside a tiny Samyang 75/1.8. The diameter of the lens is 77mm, with a non-rotating filter mount on the objective lens. Explore the sky, try frame some targets and see what works well with your DSLR and lens combination. This lens is one of canons finest lenses i have ever used. D8XX cameras, subject isolation and quality of bokeh.Zoom lenses can not hold a candle to such primes. Hi Thomas As far as I know, the Nikon D500 is not modified for astrophotography out of the box (it includes a built in IR cut filter that blocks much of the 656nm wavelength). Fantastic IQ & Bokeh. Add To Cart. I prefer this lens than the 70-200/2.8. I loved the Nikon 80-400G for a year, or so, and then found everything with it wrong, and got rid of it. You will never be able to beat this lense, believe me, i have tried them all. Typical L construction. The first shot I ever took with this lens was of my neighbor's cat, as it was sneaking around in a bush. The North America Nebula captured using the 135mm lens with a clip-in Ha filter. This is an amazing lens.Very sharp wide open and no improvement when stopped own. My questions, for deep sky pics, should I get the 135mm lens or the RedCat 51 APO 250mm f/4.9 which you mentioned here as well? The lens arrived next day, less than 24 hours after I hit the order button. Available 03/21/23. Contrasty but not harsh. Backwards compatible (film). Testing on an EOS-5D, we see that it's sharpness is almost as good wide open in the corners as on the EOS-20D with its smaller sensor. Your Baader filter passes 420-680nm and, in theory, a good APO should be able to focus that part of the spectrum with no chromatic aberration. The duck and cat are really the only good shots. A series of such images can be digitally stacked to produce excellent results. I stopped reading after the part where someone I don't know told me I "should" be doing something. Crazy fast AF! Tack sharp even at wide open aperture. The Rokinon 135mm F/2.0 includes a lens hood, lens pouch, front and rear lens caps, and a 1-year Rokinon manufacturer warranty. I mount it on my APS-C camera and the focal length literally becomes 216 mm, which is too tight. Back in 1999, Sony released the F505, their first digital camera with a Carl Zeiss lens. I dont mean to be rude, but I fail to see any photographic comparison or test to display the quality of this lens against others, concerning coma or anything else, except considerations on the manual focusing, its shape and ergonomic. These lenses go about as close as you could get without a dedicated macro lens. If you must have autofocus, and care about weight, buy the Canon. Although your target audience is beginning DSLR imagers, much of your advice also applies to using lenses with CCD cameras. On FF I use this lens for both tight portraits and landscape shots. With no general agreement about what Bokeh is it is little wonder that there is so much argument and disagreement. Stick to Andromeda, and skip the Whirlpool. Nikon 300/4 ED IF, Sigma 50/2.8 DG Macro (not a telephoto, but good). Selecting between it and the 200mm Takumar was not an easy choice but, in the end, I chose the Takumar because it seemed to have slightly better contrast. Definetely the most sharpest lens which I have ever seen. The full name of this lens is the Rokinon 135mm F/2 ED UMC, with "ED" standing for extra-low dispersion, and UMC referring to the "ultra multi-coated" optics. I see that many commenters did not get what this lens can do. What you need to know is the author is a hobbyist and hands his images over to px500, the bottom of the barrel so of course he is impressed, he doesnt use top flight gear day in, day out to earn his pay. They are by nature designed to compromise by magnification and distance, and are therefore not optically optimized at any single setting. My Nikon focus and aperture rings are a thing of highly finessed engineering beauty! I love this lens, The Sharpest Lens available for Eos cameras IMO Ive been using kit lenses for the past year, favoring the Nikkor 50mm 2.8. Creamy smooth bokeh. If you don't like that article that's your right as a member. for sample photos and video tour, This is simply the best Canon prime lens that I have tested. From my purchase research, I found a consensus that stopping down optimizes sharpness but the diaphragm will make nine diffraction spikes when stopped down. To me it is a dead spot between 85 and 200. Perhaps it's not a big thing, but for a L-graded lens this feature should be expected. Because it's an L-series lens by Canon, you can be sure that the image quality and performance of the 24-105mm meet the demanding aspects of astrophotography such as focus and star quality. That's why I really enjoy shooting portraits with it. I had a 70-200 f/4 that i used unstopped at 200 with awesome results. The EOS R6 II arrives in one of the most competitive parts of the market, facing off against some very capable competition. Overall, the lens feels very solid and well constructed. There is no such thing, in my opinion. In fact, it might be fun to try! Rain or shine, it's hard to find a camera that does all the OM-5 can for the price. For that I would investigate alternatives just to make sure. This makes me feel I shall take the Zeiss 85F1.8 off my A6000 or maybe NOT, it's just another hype article about "A" lens. In the highest contrast situations there's a hint of both purple and green fringing but both are minor and easy to remove with software. Photography is full of fuzzy concepts. Although if Bokeh and sharpness is your thing and you can live with MF the Laowa 105mm f/2 Smooth Trans Focus (STF) is amazing. This brings me to my question. 24/28mm, 50mm, 100mm, 200mm. About 3 hours of exposures split between Narrowband, Broadband and short exposure shots to make an HDR image. Stuff I used to take the photos in this video:- The Canon 135mm f2 lens: https://amzn.to/346Paz7- Sony A7III Camera: https://amzn.to/2xM776q- Sony Grip exten. There are a total of 8 stops actually written on the lens. You're right, but a headshot is exactly where I want to see all those megapixels I bought put to use! This looks to be an excellent lens with fantastic results. It is really thanks to another commentator pointing out something that finally makes sense out of this mess: This article is by someone who just got his first first telephoto ever, and is writing about how he feels when he is trying it out. Olympus 75mm f1.82. Maybe try a 400mm f/2.0 to see it that one's got enough blur. Personally, I can't stand these circles, and I see them as VERY distracting.Lots of fads come and go, and this is just another one of these fads that some photographers are obsessed with. I have done a review comparing the sharpness and quality of bokeh to the Canon 70-200 2.8. The Samyang 135mm F/2 easily lives up to its hype and should be near the top of your list of purchases if you are new or experienced in the field of astrophotography. Not heavy like the white tele-zooms. Also, the newer and much more expensive 200mm F4 SMC Pentax with the K mount is decisively inferior, showing small but annoying red chromatic aberration. http://www.idyll.com/laney2014 This image of NGC 7000 was done at F/4 at iso 800 with a Canon 20D mod. I do not presume to further decorate the universe, and perceive them for what they are: interference. (Actually if I can live with the DoF I prefer it to my 85/1.2 too, as there is much less bonus colour.) Thanks.. or.. Clear Skies! Oh and it's stabilised. In this post, Ill share my results using an affordable prime telephoto lens for astrophotography, the Rokinon 135mm F/2.0 ED UMC. Sure, if you scroll through his page there are quite a few lens tests on starshttps://www.flickr.chotos/ytoropin/, Community Forum Software by IP.BoardLicensed to: Cloudy Nights, Article: The Best Telephoto Lenses for Astrophotography, This is not recommended for shared computers, Review of Explore Scientific First Light 8, COUNTING SUNSPOTS WITH A $10 OPTICAL TUBE ASSEMBLY, Hubble Optics 14 inch Dobsonian - Part 2: The SiTech GoTo system, iStar Opticals Phantom FCL 140-6.5 review. Did anybody use this lens for DSLR astrophoto? Do you have a link to Yuri's photo stream? It is fantastically sharp, can make beautiful blurred backgrounds and bokeh, and is both light and inexpensive for what you get. don't get me wrong; this lens will take great photos, but the 'flatness' i was getting in my photos nearly had me give up 25 years of hobby photography. Canon CR-N700 4K PTZ Camera with 15x Zoom. wew.. The 5D's larger pixels also make chromatic aberration somewhat lower at most apertures. It has no chromatic aberration, and no hint of star deformities in the corners. The Rho Ophiuchi Cloud Complex by Eric Cauble using the Samyang 135mm F/2 lens. Over the years, I have tried more than two dozen telephoto lenses, until I finally found three or four perfect solutions. If you want the best value possible for your money, and can survive without autofocus, buy the Samyang. Im currently shooting with a Canon 60D. The Bokeh includes as well all that is in the focus, but mainly talked about how it comes visible in out of focus areas. Chromatic aberration is almost eliminated in narrowband, so lenses with that problem may be fine performers. An h-alpha filter would still be useful for your D500, but much more so if it were modified! Large emission nebulae like the California Nebula (pictured below) are a great choice for this focal length. The Heart and Soul Nebulae captured using a DSLR and the Rokinon 135mm lens. In the right hands this lens really does have "magic pixie dust", as a friend once described. Take care not to confuse this lens with the 200mm F4 SMC Takumar 6x7 which has a different optical configuration, and which I have never tested. Pentax seems to have put more emphasis than others on keeping the resolution uniform all over the field. Your first serious portrait lens should be a modern stabilized 70-200 f/2.8. These capable cameras should be solid and well-built, have both the speed and focus to capture fast action and offer professional-level image quality. This lens provides all of these requirements. I have had a blast with a samyang, but a used 135mm f2.8 is VERY . My Canon EOS 60Da with the Rokinon 135mm F/2.0 mounted to a Fornax Mounts LighTrack II. I wish every lens was this good!! Deep-sky astrophotography is often associated with a camera and telescope, but the truth is there are a lot of great camera lenses for astrophotography out there. Well saturated but neutral. ";s:7:"keyword";s:31:"canon 135mm f2 astrophotography";s:5:"links";s:199:"Is Robert Fuller Still Alive Today,
Articles C
";s:7:"expired";i:-1;}